A multi-field catalytic reactor combines two or more of light, heat, electric field and magnetic field on the same sample, independently or simultaneously. Choose it when your research question is about coupling — photo-thermal synergy, photo-electro coupling, magnetic field effects on radical pairs — and a single-field reactor cannot separate the variables.
| Field combination | Typical system | Working range | Use when |
|---|---|---|---|
| Light + heat, gas–solid | PLR-RP / RT series photo-thermal reactor | Up to 1050 °C, 3 MPa (high-temperature version); 650 °C, 10 MPa (high-pressure version); 850 °C, 6 MPa (standard) | Photo-thermal catalysis, CO₂ hydrogenation, fixed-bed evaluation |
| Light + heat, flow differential | PLR-PTSR II | 550 °C, 1.6 MPa, differential or integral mode | Kinetics with controlled conversion |
| Light + heat, pressurised continuous | PLR-HTSR 2.0 | 500 °C, 1.0 MPa, Φ30 mm sapphire window | Pressurised photo-thermal with optical access |
| Light + heat, small gas charge | PLR-GPTR 50 / 50T | 300 °C / 400 °C, 50 mL, window transmission >97 % | Small-volume screening |
| Light + heat + electric + magnetic, liquid–solid | PLR MSCRD-I | Thermal room temp–100 °C (±1 °C); electric 0–30 V, 0–10 A; magnetic N52 ×6, 150 mm travel, 0.1 mm positioning; 0–0.5 MPa | Four-field coupling studies in liquid phase |
Anyone can put a magnet next to a reactor. Making the result reproducible is another matter. Magnetic field strength falls off steeply with distance, so a field that is "about 0.3 T" is meaningless unless the magnet-to-sample distance is fixed and repeatable.
This is why a motorised slide with 0.1 mm positioning accuracy over 150 mm of travel matters more than the magnet grade. It converts "move the magnet by hand" into a defined field-strength series, which is the difference between a publishable trend and an anecdote. If you build your own multi-field rig, the positioning stage is where the money should go.
Be honest about the envelope. A liquid-phase four-field system with a 100 °C ceiling and 0.5 MPa working pressure will not do gas–solid photo-thermal catalysis at 300 °C, and it will not do CO₂ hydrogenation at 3 MPa. Those belong to the PLR-RP / HTSR families. Buying one platform to cover both usually means compromising both.
A reactor that applies two or more stimuli — light, heat, electric field, magnetic field — to the same sample, with independent control, so that coupling effects can be measured rather than inferred.
Only if your research question involves spin polarisation, magnetic heating or radical-pair recombination. For routine photocatalytic rate measurements it adds variables without adding information.
Rarely well. The pressure and temperature envelopes, window requirements and reactor geometry differ enough that specialised systems are usually the better investment.
Positioning accuracy for the magnetic field and temperature control accuracy for the thermal field. Both determine whether a measured effect is real or an artefact of where the sample sat.